Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1067288
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Nitrous or nitric? Same difference. Molecular formulas in the 1840s
Author(s)
Alston, TA
Year
2007
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
ISSN:
0952-8180
Volume
19
Issue
2
Page Numbers
159-161
Language
English
PMID
17379133
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.08.009
Web of Science Id
WOS:000245609000018
Abstract
The molecular formulas given by James Y. Simpson for nitrous oxide, diethyl ether, and chloroform are difficult to interpret today. The organic formulas are "incorrect" today because Jean Dumas (the influential chemist who was one of the discoverers of chloroform) used John Dalton's presumption of molecular simplicity. That is, water was long presumed to be HO. The nitrous oxide formula was incorrect owing to confusion with Dalton's nitrous gas, now termed nitric oxide. The Simpson formulas illustrate that inhaled anesthesia arrived at the time of a cusp in the history of chemistry.
Keywords
chloroform; J Dalton; JBA Dumas; nitrous oxide; JY Simpson
Tags
•
Chloroform Combined (current)
Chloroform (original)
References: 2000-2018
PubMed
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity