Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
2000822 
Journal Article 
Preliminary toxicological assessment of phthalate esters from drinking water consumed in Portugal 
Santana, J; Giraudi, C; Marengo, E; Robotti, E; Pires, S; Nunes, I; Gaspar, EM 
2014 
Yes 
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
ISSN: 0944-1344
EISSN: 1614-7499 
21 
1380-1390 
English 
This paper reports, for the first time, the concentrations of selected phthalates in drinking water consumed in Portugal. The use of bottled water in Portugal has increased in recent years. The main material for bottles is polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Its plasticizer components can contaminate water by leaching, and several scientific studies have evidenced potential health risks of phthalates to humans of all ages. With water being one of the most essential elements to human health and because it is consumed by ingestion, the evaluation of drinking water quality, with respect to phthalate contents, is important. This study tested seven commercial brands of bottled water consumed in Portugal, six PET and one glass (the most consumed) bottled water. Furthermore, tap water from Lisbon and three small neighbor cities was analyzed. Phthalates (di-n-butyl phthalate ester (DnBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ester (DEHP), and di-i-butyl phthalate ester (DIBP)) in water samples were quantified (PET and glass) by means of direct immersion solid-phase microextraction and ionic liquid gas chromatography associated with flame ionization detection or mass spectrometry due to their high boiling points and water solubility. The method utilized in this study showed a linear range for target phthalates between 0.02 and 6.5 μg L(-1), good precision and low limits of detection that were between 0.01 and 0.06 μg L(-1), and quantitation between 0.04 and 0.19 μg L(-1). Only three phthalates were detected in Portuguese drinking waters: dibutyl (DnBP), diisobutyl (DIBP), and di(ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). Concentrations ranged between 0.06 and 6.5 μg L(-1) for DnBP, between 0.02 and 0.16 μg L(-1) for DEHP, and between 0.1 and 1.89 μg L(-1) for DIBP. The concentration of DEHP was found to be up to five times higher in PET than in glass bottled water. Surprisingly, all the three phthalates were detected in glass bottled water with the amount of DnBP being higher (6.5 μg L(-1)) than in PET bottled water. These concentrations do not represent direct risk to human health. Regarding potable tap water, only DIBP and DEHP were detected. Two of the cities showed concentration of all three phthalates in their water below the limits of detection of the method. All the samples showed phthalate concentrations below 6 μg L(-1), the maximum admissible concentration in water established by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The concentrations measured in Portuguese bottled waters do not represent any risk for adult's health. 
Phthalates (PAEs); DnBP; DIBP; DEHP; Persistent organic pollutants; Profiles; Drinking water; Bottled water; Ionic liquid gas chromatography (IL-GC); Portugal 
• Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP)
     Database Searches
          Pubmed
          Web of Science
          Litsearch September 2014 - February 2015
               WOS
     LitSearch June 2013 – Jan 2014
          PubMed
     LitSearch Jan 2014 - Sep 2014
          Web of Science
     Excluded: No Primary Data on Health Effects
          Exposure levels
• Diisobutyl Phthalate (DIBP) Final
     Database Searches
          March 2014 Database Search
               PubMed
               Web of Science
          September 2014 update
               Toxline
               Web of Science
          June 2015 Update
               Web of Science
          December 2015 Update
               Web of Science
          June 2016 Update
               Web of Science
          January 2017 Update
     Secondary Literature
          Risk assessments
• Phthalates – Targeted Search for Epidemiological Studies
     Source – all searches
          Pubmed
          WOS
     Excluded
     Source - Dec 2013 Update (Private)
          Pubmed
     Source - Jun 2014 Update (Private)
          WOS
     Source – Dec 2014 Update (Private)
          Pubmed
          WOS
     Source – Mar 2015 Update (Private)
          WOS