Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2044538
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Mechanism of the Mixed Surfactant Micelle Formation
Author(s)
Cui, X; Jiang, Yan; Yang, C; Lu, X; Chen, H; Mao, S; Liu, M; Yuan, H; Luo, P; Du, Y
Year
2010
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
ISSN:
1520-6106
EISSN:
1520-5207
Volume
114
Issue
23
Page Numbers
7808-7816
Language
English
PMID
20481561
DOI
10.1021/jp101032z
Web of Science Id
WOS:000278479900014
Abstract
This article provides a full description of the mixed micelle formation process at a molecular level. The mechanism of mixed micelle formation in binary surfactant aqueous solution systems, ionic/nonionic mixed systems (12-2-12/TX-100, 14-2-14/TX-100, and SDS/TX-100), and ionic/ionic mixed systems (12-2-12/TTAB, 14-2-14/TTAB, and SDS/CTAB), in heavy water solutions was studied by (1)H NMR spectroscopy. The critical micellization concentrations of each individual component in the mixed surfactant solutions were gained by analyzing changes in chemical shift and intensities of resonance peaks. The chemical shift changes indicated that in the 12-2-12/TX-100 and SDS/TX-100 systems, micelles of TX-100 formed first, and then 12-2-12 or SDS molecules were fused in the micelles, respectively, which has been proved by 2D NOESY experiments. In contrast, 14-2-14 was the first component to form the micelles in the 14-2-14/TX-100 system. Although 12-2-12 and 14-2-14 are analogs and differ only in the length of the hydrophobic chain by two methylene groups, they showed different behaviors in the micellization processes in the mixture with TX-100. The observation suggests that in the binary surfactant system under current study, the component with lower cmc in the mixed solution aggregates first; then, the other one fuses, resulting in the mixed micelles as the total concentration increases. The same results were obtained for the ionic/ionic solutions, 12-2-12/TTAB, 14-2-14/TTAB, and SDS/CTAB. The above results suggest that the two mixed surfactants do not aggregate synchronously. It obviously demonstrates that the so-called "cmc of the mixed surfactant solution" needs reconsideration.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity