Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2278848
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
[Burst Pressures of the Central Pulmonary Artery after Bipolar Vessel Sealing - Examination in an Ex Vivo Model.]
Author(s)
Kirschbaum, A; Sasse, T; Palade, E
Year
2014
Volume
139
Issue
3
Page Numbers
342-345
Language
German
PMID
24399504
DOI
10.1055/s-0033-1350858
Web of Science Id
WOS:000338030000021
Abstract
Background: In every pneumonectomy due to a malignant or benign pulmonary disease the pulmonary artery must be centrally ligated and dissected. If a thoracotomy is undertaken the vessel is usually doubly ligated with a non-absorbable suture and then dissected. Alternatively a vessel stapler can be used. In a thorascopic procedure only the stapler can be used. In the search for a cheaper alternative we investigated whether a bipolar instrument as employed in thorascopy could be used and reused. The aim of this study was to investigate the static pressure performance of the closed vessel in an ex vivo non-perfused vessel model. Material and Methods: From freshly slaughtered pigs the heart-lung block was removed. The central pulmonary artery was exposed. For sealing the vessel we used the bipolar sealing system MARSEAL®, Brothers Martin company (Tuttlingen, Germany), consisting of an HF generator and a MARSEAL slim instrument. Two groups were formed: group A (n = 49) Stromart SealSafe®, step G5 (automatic performance regulation, duration of use depending on impedance) and group B (n = 58) bipolar Stromart "Macrocoag" (power: 120 W, constant duration of use: 15 s). At the end of the pulmonary artery a pressure probe was implanted to digitally measure the pressure at the vessel sealing suture. After sealing the end of the artery, the vessel was slowly filled via an external source in order to determine the burst pressure. The burst pressure was reached as soon as the vessel suture started to leak. The average values of the 2 groups were then compared (t test for independent variables, significance set at p < 0.05). Results: All examined vessels (n = 107) had the same vessel diameter of 15 ± 3 mm. The average value of the burst pressure in group A was 139.3 ± 62.17 mmHg, that in group B 124.8 ± 38.46 mmHg. The ranges of burst pressures were in group A 51-297.0 mmHg und in group B 60.75-244.5 mmHg. There was no significant difference between group A and group B (p = 0.071). Conclusions: Satisfactory burst pressures in the central pulmonary artery can also be achieved with the bipolar sealing instrument MARSEAL® and the impedance-controlled Stromart SealSafe®. However, because of the large scattering of the measured values, further studies are required.
Tags
IRIS
•
Arsenic Hazard ID
PubMed
Excluded
Non-English
PubMed
Excluded
Non-English
2. Lit Search Updates through Oct 2015
PubMed
Initial Filter
Non-English
•
Arsenic (Inorganic)
1. Literature
Lit search updates through Oct 2015
2. Initial Filter
Non English
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity