Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2613080
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Relationships among Mineralizable Soil Nitrogen, Soil Properties, and Climatic Indices
Author(s)
Dessureault-Rompre, J; Zebarth, BJ; Burton, DL; Sharifi, M; Cooper, J; Grant, CA; Drury, CF
Year
2010
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
ISSN:
0361-5995
EISSN:
1435-0661
Volume
74
Issue
4
Page Numbers
1218-1227
DOI
10.2136/sssaj2009.0213
Web of Science Id
WOS:000279363600016
Abstract
Soil N mineralization is an important N contributor to crop uptake; however, the soil and climatic controls on soil mineralizable N are poorly understood. Soil samples from 56 sites across Canada were used to determine the potential to predict the size of mineralizable N pools through simple soil properties and through simple climatic indices and the re_clim indices. Mineralizable N was determined using a 24-wk aerobic incubation at 25 degrees C. Potentially mineralizable N (N(0)) was estimated by curve fitting using N mineralized from 2 to 24 wk, and Pool I, a labile mineralizable N pool, was determined as the N mineralized in the first 2-wk period. Soil properties were relatively effective predictors of N(0) with soil organic N (SON) and sand explaining 40 and 34% of the variability, respectively. Particulate organic matter N (POM-N) and pH explained 18 and 25%, respectively, of the variability in Pool I. Simple climate normals were generally poor predictors of pool size except for potential evapotranspiration (PET), which predicted 24% of the variability in Pool I. The re_clim indices, normally applied to the activity of soil decomposers and applied here for the first time to explain soil mineralizable N pool size variability, performed better than simple climate indices and explained up to 26% of the variation in N(0). By including soil and climatic parameters in a multiple regression model, it was possible to explain about 63 and 40% of the variability in N(0) and Pool I, respectively, across a wide range of arable soils in Canada.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity