Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4335934
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Biodegradation of artificial monolayers applied to water storages to reduce evaporative loss
Author(s)
Pittaway, P; Herzig, M; Stuckey, N; Larsen, K
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Water Science and Technology
ISSN:
0273-1223
EISSN:
1996-9732
Volume
72
Issue
8
Page Numbers
1334-1340
Language
English
PMID
26465303
DOI
10.2166/wst.2015.348
Web of Science Id
WOS:000374288300010
Abstract
Repeat applications of an artificial monolayer to the interfacial boundary layer of large agricultural water storages during periods of high evaporative demand remains the most commercially feasible water conservation strategy. However, the interfacial boundary layer (or microlayer) is ecologically distinct from subsurface water, and repeat monolayer applications may adversely affect microlayer processes. In this study, the natural cleansing mechanisms operating within the microlayer were investigated to compare the biodegradability of two fatty alcohol (C16OH and C18OH) and one glycol ether (C18E1) monolayer compound. The C16OH and C18OH compounds were more susceptible to microbial degradation, but the C18E1 compound was most susceptible to indirect photodegradation. On clean water the surface pressure and evaporation reduction achieved with a compressed C18E1 monolayer was superior to the C18OH monolayer, but on brown water the surface pressure dropped rapidly. These results suggest artificial monolayers are readily degraded by the synergy between photo and microbial degradation. The residence time of C18OH and C18E1 monolayers on clear water is sufficient for cost-effective water conservation. However, the susceptibility of C18E1 to photodegradation indicates the application of this monolayer to brown water may not be cost-effective.
Keywords
United Kingdom--UK; United States--US; New York; Cleaning; Evaporation; Biodegradation; Photodegradation; Environmental science; Biological assays; Subsurface water; Pressure; Microbial degradation; Water conservation; Biodegradability; Boundary layer; Bioavailability; Ecology; Microorganisms; Carbon; Alcohol; Deoxyribonucleic acid--DNA; Phenols; Monolayers; Monomolecular films; Boundary layers; Residence time; Alcohols; Evaporation reduction
Tags
OPPT
•
Fatty Alcohols
Literature Search
Fate
WOS (private)
Environmental Hazard
WOS (private)
Proquest (private)
Full-text Review
Fate
Data Evaluation
Fate
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity