Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8667153
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Coiled-tubing drilling of horizontal sidetrack in House Mountain Field, Alberta
Author(s)
Milligan, MR; Andreychuk, MT; Lunan, WB
Year
2000
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
SPE Drilling & Completion
ISSN:
1064-6671
EISSN:
1930-0204
Volume
15
Issue
2
Page Numbers
92-96
DOI
10.2118/64225-PA
Web of Science Id
WOS:000087747000003
Abstract
In 1995, the first horizontal sidetrack successfully drilled using coiled tubing (CT) was carried out at Shell"s House Mountain 7. oilfield. The objective was to drill underbalanced a 3 7/8-in. diam by 300-m-long horizontal hole section from an existing vertical, cased oil well. The existing well was re-entered using a conventional drilling rig; a window milled in the casing, and the build section drilled to an inclination of 90 degrees. 2 3/8-in. CT was then used to directionally drill the horizontal section underbalanced with nitrified water. The zone of interest was a Devonian-age reef-edge and limestone structure, at a depth of about 2200 m, called the Slave Point. A case history of directionally drilling the horizontal sidetrack using 2 3/8-in. OD. CT is provided. Coiled-tubing drilling proved to be a cost-effective alternative to drilling the horizontal sidetrack without using a conventional drilling rig. Shorter trip times, underbalanced drilling, enhanced rates of penetration (ROP), and the ability to maintain weight an bit were all achieved. ROPs increased by up to three-fold while drilling underbalanced.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity