Serum perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) concentrations and liver function biomarkers in a population with elevated PFOA exposure

Gallo, V; Leonardi, G; Genser, B; Lopez-Espinosa, MJ; Frisbee, SJ; Karlsson, L; Ducatman, AM; Fletcher, T

HERO ID

1276142

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

2012

Language

English

PMID

22289616

HERO ID 1276142
In Press No
Year 2012
Title Serum perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) concentrations and liver function biomarkers in a population with elevated PFOA exposure
Authors Gallo, V; Leonardi, G; Genser, B; Lopez-Espinosa, MJ; Frisbee, SJ; Karlsson, L; Ducatman, AM; Fletcher, T
Journal Environmental Health Perspectives
Volume 120
Issue 5
Page Numbers 655-660
Abstract <strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) persist in the environment and are found in relatively high concentrations in animal livers. Studies in humans have reported inconsistent associations between PFOA and liver enzymes.<br /><br /><strong>OBJECTIVES: </strong>We examined the cross-sectional association between serum PFOA and PFOS concentrations with markers of liver function in adults.<br /><br /><strong>METHODS: </strong>The C8 Health Project collected data on 69,030 persons; of these, a total of 47,092 adults were included in the present analysis. Linear regression models were fitted for natural log (ln)-transformed values of alanine transaminase (ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and direct bilirubin on PFOA, PFOS, and potential confounders. Logistic regression models were fitted comparing deciles of PFOA or PFOS in relation to high biomarker levels. A multilevel analysis comparing the evidence for association of PFOA with liver function at the individual level within water districts to that at the population level between water districts was also performed.<br /><br /><strong>RESULTS: </strong>ln-PFOA and ln-PFOS were associated with ln-ALT in linear regression models [PFOA: coefficient, 0.022; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.018, 0.025; PFOS: coefficient, 0.020; 95% CI: 0.014, 0.026] and with raised ALT in logistic regression models [with a steady increase in the odds ratio (OR) estimates across deciles of PFOA and PFOS; PFOA: OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.13; PFOS: OR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.18]. There was less consistent evidence of an association of PFOA and GGT or bilirubin. The relationship with bilirubin appears to rise at low levels of PFOA and to fall again at higher levels.<br /><br /><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>These results show a positive association between PFOA and PFOS concentrations and serum ALT level, a marker of hepatocellular damage.
Doi 10.1289/ehp.1104436
Pmid 22289616
Wosid WOS:000303546000027
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Comments Source: Web of Science WOS:000303546000027
Is Public Yes
Language Text English
Keyword C8; cross-sectional study; liver function biomarkers; PFOA; PFOS; population-based survey
Is Qa No