The mismeasure of dermal absorption

Kissel, JC

HERO ID

2947724

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

2011

Language

English

PMID

20424648

HERO ID 2947724
In Press No
Year 2011
Title The mismeasure of dermal absorption
Authors Kissel, JC
Journal Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Volume 21
Issue 3
Page Numbers 302-309
Abstract The results of dermal absorption experiments are routinely and often exclusively reported in terms of fractional absorption. However, fractional absorption is not generally independent of skin loading conditions. As a consequence, experimental outcomes are commonly misinterpreted. This can lead in turn to poor estimation of exposures under field conditions and inadequate threat assessment. To aid interpretation of dermal absorption-related phenomena, a dimensionless group representing the ratio of mass delivery to plausible absorptive flux under experimental or environmental conditions is proposed. High values of the dimensionless dermal number (N(DERM)) connote surplus supply (i.e., flux-limited) conditions. Under such conditions, fractional absorption will generally depend on load and should not be assumed transferable to other conditions. At low values of N(DERM), dermal absorption will be delivery-limited. Under those conditions, high fractional absorption is feasible barring maldistribution or depletion due to volatilization, washing, mechanical abrasion or other means. Similar logic also applies to skin sampling and dermal toxicity testing. Skin surface sampling at low N(DERM) is unlikely to provide an appropriate measure of potential dermal dose due to depletion, whereas dermal toxicity testing at high N(DERM) is unlikely to show dose dependence due to saturation.
Doi 10.1038/jes.2010.22
Pmid 20424648
Wosid WOS:000289712500009
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Is Public Yes
Language Text English