Bayesian methods for uncertainty factor application for derivation of reference values
Simon, TW; Zhu, Y; Dourson, ML; Beck, NB
HERO ID
4968278
Reference Type
Journal Article
Year
2016
Language
English
PMID
| HERO ID | 4968278 |
|---|---|
| In Press | No |
| Year | 2016 |
| Title | Bayesian methods for uncertainty factor application for derivation of reference values |
| Authors | Simon, TW; Zhu, Y; Dourson, ML; Beck, NB |
| Journal | Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology |
| Volume | 80 |
| Page Numbers | 9-24 |
| Abstract | In 2014, the National Research Council (NRC) published Review of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Process that considers methods EPA uses for developing toxicity criteria for non-carcinogens. These criteria are the Reference Dose (RfD) for oral exposure and Reference Concentration (RfC) for inhalation exposure. The NRC Review suggested using Bayesian methods for application of uncertainty factors (UFs) to adjust the point of departure dose or concentration to a level considered to be without adverse effects for the human population. The NRC foresaw Bayesian methods would be potentially useful for combining toxicity data from disparate sources-high throughput assays, animal testing, and observational epidemiology. UFs represent five distinct areas for which both adjustment and consideration of uncertainty may be needed. NRC suggested UFs could be represented as Bayesian prior distributions, illustrated the use of a log-normal distribution to represent the composite UF, and combined this distribution with a log-normal distribution representing uncertainty in the point of departure (POD) to reflect the overall uncertainty. Here, we explore these suggestions and present a refinement of the methodology suggested by NRC that considers each individual UF as a distribution. From an examination of 24 evaluations from EPA's IRIS program, when individual UFs were represented using this approach, the geometric mean fold change in the value of the RfD or RfC increased from 3 to over 30, depending on the number of individual UFs used and the sophistication of the assessment. We present example calculations and recommendations for implementing the refined NRC methodology. |
| Doi | 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.018 |
| Pmid | 27211295 |
| Wosid | WOS:000383314900002 |
| Url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211295 |
| Is Certified Translation | No |
| Dupe Override | No |
| Is Public | Yes |
| Language Text | English |
| Keyword | Uncertainty factor; Bayesian methods; Reference dose; Reference concentration; Risk assessment; Hazard assessment |
| Relationship(s) |
|