Land use regression model for ultrafine particles in Amsterdam
Hoek, G; Beelen, R; Kos, G; Dijkema, M; Zee, SC; Fischer, PH; Brunekreef, B
HERO ID
674679
Reference Type
Journal Article
Year
2011
Language
English
PMID
| HERO ID | 674679 |
|---|---|
| In Press | No |
| Year | 2011 |
| Title | Land use regression model for ultrafine particles in Amsterdam |
| Authors | Hoek, G; Beelen, R; Kos, G; Dijkema, M; Zee, SC; Fischer, PH; Brunekreef, B |
| Journal | Environmental Science & Technology |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Page Numbers | 622-628 |
| Abstract | There are currently no epidemiological studies on health effects of long-term exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP), largely because data on spatial exposure contrasts for UFP is lacking. The objective of this study was to develop a land use regression (LUR) model for UFP in the city of Amsterdam. Total particle number concentrations (PNC), PM10, PM2.5, and its soot content were measured directly outside 50 homes spread over the city of Amsterdam. Each home was measured during one week. Continuous measurements at a central urban background site were used to adjust the average concentration for temporal variation. Predictor variables (traffic, address density, land use) were obtained using geographic information systems. A model including the product of traffic intensity and the inverse distance to the nearest road squared, address density, and location near the port explained 67% of the variability in measured PNC. LUR models for PM2.5, soot, and coarse particles (PM10, PM2.5) explained 57%, 76%, and 37% of the variability in measured concentrations. Predictions from the PNC model correlated highly with predictions from LUR models for PM2.5, soot, and coarse particles. A LUR model for PNC has been developed, with similar validity as previous models for more commonly measured pollutants. |
| Doi | 10.1021/es1023042 |
| Pmid | 21158386 |
| Wosid | WOS:000286090500045 |
| Is Certified Translation | No |
| Dupe Override | No |
| Is Public | Yes |
| Language Text | English |
| Is Qa | No |