A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: What is the added value of the second generation?
Janer, G; Hakkert, BC; Slob, W; Vermeire, T; Piersma, AH
HERO ID
679995
Reference Type
Journal Article
Year
2007
Language
English
PMID
| HERO ID | 679995 |
|---|---|
| In Press | No |
| Year | 2007 |
| Title | A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: What is the added value of the second generation? |
| Authors | Janer, G; Hakkert, BC; Slob, W; Vermeire, T; Piersma, AH |
| Journal | Reproductive Toxicology |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Page Numbers | 92-102 |
| Abstract | Increasing pressure is exerted by some stakeholders to reduce the two-generation study to a one-generation study, a measure that would considerably reduce the number of animals and other costs involved in these lengthy studies. The present study retrospectively evaluates 176 multi-generation studies to assess potential differences between the first and the second generation, both in terms of the types of effects observed and in terms of the effective doses. All substances classified as reproductive toxicants by the Directive 92/32/EEC or considered as toxic to fertility by the California EPA for which we found a multi-generation study were included (n = 58 studies). The second generation in the two-generation studies considered affected neither the overall NOAEL nor the critical effect. Therefore, it had no impact on the ensuing risk assessment, nor on classification and labeling. However, several substances did show an increased sensitivity of the F1 adults in comparison to the P0. These results support the proposal of replacing the current two-generation study by a one-generation study with a more extensive assessment of parameters at F1 adulthood. |
| Doi | 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.04.068 |
| Pmid | 17572063 |
| Wosid | WOS:000248775200010 |
| Is Certified Translation | No |
| Dupe Override | No |
| Comments | Source: Web of Science WOS:000248775200010 |
| Is Public | Yes |
| Language Text | English |
| Keyword | Two-generation study; One-generation study; Reproductive toxicity; Developmental toxicity; Fertility; NOAEL; Classification and labeling; Risk assessment |
| Is Qa | No |