Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
1056757 
Journal Article 
Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system 
Schmitz, C; Biewald, A; Lotze-Campen, H; Popp, A; Dietrich, JP; Bodirsky, B; Krause, M; Weindl, I 
2012 
Yes 
Global Environmental Change
ISSN: 0959-3780 
22 
1 
189-209 
WOS:000300817500018 
The volume of agricultural trade increased by more than ten times throughout the past six decades and is likely to continue with high rates in the future. Thereby, it largely affects environment and climate. We analyse future trade scenarios covering the period of 2005-2045 by evaluating economic and environmental effects using the global land-use model MAgPIE ("Model of Agricultural Production and its Impact on the Environment"). This is the first trade study using spatially explicit mapping of land use patterns and greenhouse gas emissions. We focus on three scenarios: the reference scenario fixes current trade patterns, the policy scenario follows a historically derived liberalisation pathway, and the liberalisation scenario assumes a path, which ends with full trade liberalisation in 2045. Further trade liberalisation leads to lower global costs of food. Regions with comparative advantages like Latin America for cereals and oil crops and China for livestock products will export more. In contrast, regions like the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia face the highest increases of imports. Deforestation, mainly in Latin America, leads to significant amounts of additional carbon emissions due to trade liberalisation. Non-CO2 emissions will mostly shift to China due to comparative advantages in livestock production and rising livestock demand in the region. Overall, further trade liberalisation leads to higher economic benefits at the expense of environment and climate, if no other regulations are put in place. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 
International trade; GHG emissions; Land use model; Land use change 
Other
• Third Biofuels Report to Congress
          50% to 100%
          50% to 100%