Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1060359
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys: a review
Author(s)
Wataha, JC
Year
2000
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
ISSN:
0022-3913
Volume
83
Issue
2
Page Numbers
223-234
Language
English
PMID
10668036
Web of Science Id
WOS:000085375500016
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dental casting alloys are widely used in applications that place them into contact with oral tissues for many years. With the development of new dental alloys over the past 15 years, many questions remain about their biologic safety. Practitioners must choose among hundreds of alloy compositions, often without regard to biologic properties. PURPOSE: This article is an evidence-based tutorial for clinicians. Concepts and current issues relevant to the biologic effects of dental casting alloys are presented. SUMMARY: The single most relevant property of a casting alloy to its biologic safety is its corrosion. Systemic and local toxicity, allergy, and carcinogenicity all result from elements in the alloy being released into the mouth during corrosion. Little evidence supports concerns of casting alloys causing systemic toxicity. The occurrence of local toxic effects (adjacent to the alloy) is not well documented, but is a higher risk, primarily because local tissues are exposed to much higher concentrations of released metal ions. Several elements such as nickel and cobalt have relatively high potential to cause allergy, but the true risk of using alloys containing these elements remains undefined. Prudence dictates that alloys containing these elements be avoided if possible. Several elements in casting alloys are known mutagens, and a few such as beryllium and cadmium are known carcinogens in different chemical forms. Despite these facts, carcinogenic effects from dental casting alloys have not been demonstrated. Prudent practitioners should avoid alloys containing these known carcinogens. CONCLUSION: To minimize biologic risks, dentists should select alloys that have the lowest release of elements (lowest corrosion). This goal can be achieved by using high-noble or noble alloys with single-phase microstructures. However, there are exceptions to this generality, and selection of an alloy should be made on a case-by-case basis using corrosion and biologic data from dental manufacturers.
Keywords
Biocompatible Materials/ chemistry/ toxicity; Carcinogens/analysis; Corrosion; Dental Alloys/ chemistry/ toxicity; Dental Casting Technique; Epithelial Cells/drug effects; Gingival Crevicular Fluid; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hypersensitivity; Ions; Metals/analysis/toxicity; Mouth Mucosa/drug effects; Mutagens/analysis; Saliva; Solubility
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity