Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1330978
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
An Evaluation of Fish Bone Char as an Appropriate Arsenic and Fluoride Removal Technology for Emerging Regions
Author(s)
Brunson, LR; Sabatini, DA
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Environmental Engineering Science
ISSN:
1092-8758
EISSN:
1557-9018
Volume
26
Issue
12
Page Numbers
1777-1784
DOI
10.1089/ees.2009.0222
Web of Science Id
WOS:000272370000010
URL
http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ees.2009.0222
Exit
Abstract
Arsenic and fluoride are both contributors to the global water crisis, with significant health problems resulting from drinking water with levels higher than the 0.01 mg/L and 1.5 mg/L World Health Organization standards, respectively. This study evaluates fish bone char as an appropriate fluoride and arsenic removal technology for emerging regions, and investigates differences between fish bone char and cow bone char. The results of batch tests, specific surface area measurements, chemical composition testing, and point of zero charge (PZC) determination show that charring temperature affects the capacity of fish bone char to adsorb fluoride. It was found that 500 degrees C is the best charring temperature based on removal effectiveness and residual water quality. Specific surface area is affected by charring temperature. It was observed that at lower temperatures, such as 300 degrees C, some of the organic material was not removed during charring and the specific surface area was only 25% of what was observed at higher temperatures. The study also found that fish bone char can remove fluoride and arsenic simultaneously with minimal competition, albeit fluoride is removed more effectively than arsenic. Additionally, the data suggest that fish bone char is a viable option for fluoride removal in developing countries, and minor differences in fluoride removal capacity between cow bone char and fish bone char were discussed. These differences were found to be caused in part by variation in phosphorus content and equilibrium pH of the solution in contact with the bone char media.
Keywords
bone char; fluoride; arsenic; cow bone char; fish bone char; appropriate water treatment
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity