Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
1522831 
Journal Article 
COMPARISON OF GAS SAMPLING BAGS TO TEMPORARILY STORE HYDROGEN SULFIDE, AMMONIA, AND GREENHOUSE GASES 
Akdeniz, N; Janni, KA; Jacobson, LD; Hetchler, BP 
2011 
Transactions of the ASABE
ISSN: 2151-0032
EISSN: 2151-0040 
54 
653-661 
The National Air Emission Monitoring Study (NAEMS) project
measured gas concentrations using automated semi-continuous gas analyzers. An alternative gas
sampling technique is to use portable systems to fill 50 L gas sample bags over 24 h sampling
periods and measure gas concentrations later in the laboratory. For this technique, a gas
sampling bag that can retain gases over 24 h is needed. The objective of the study was to assess
the impact of initial gas concentrations (low, medium, and high) and storage times (2, 6, 12, 24,
36, 48 h) on hydrogen sulfide, total reduced sulfur (TRS), ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide
stability in Tedlar and FlexFoil bags. Average gas concentrations ranged from 771 to 2,655 ppb,
from 782 to 2,750 ppb, from 657 to 1,997 ppb, from 10,441 to 13,803 ppb, and from 337 to 344 ppb
for H2S, TRS, NH3, CH4, and N2O, respectively. Bag reusability and background contamination were
also investigated. Percent recoveries from FlexFoil bags ranged from 75% to 99.5% for all gases
and concentrations except for TRS at high concentrations. For TRS at high concentrations, percent
recovery from FlexFoil bags was 68.8%. No gas desorption or permeation was observed when using
new FlexFoil bags. FlexFoil bags were more durable than Tedlar bags to mechanical stress and
aging effects. There was no need to use a cover for FlexFoil bags to protect samples from
sunlight. The cost of FlexFoil bags was lower than that of Tedlar bags. 
Ammonia; FlexFoil bag; Greenhouse gas; Hydrogen sulfide; Tedlar bag