Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1524422
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion
Author(s)
Baik, HeeJ; Kim, YJin; Kim, JHak
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
ISSN:
0265-0215
EISSN:
1365-2346
Volume
26
Issue
5
Page Numbers
377-381
PMID
19521294
DOI
10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831dcd4d
Web of Science Id
WOS:000265561700004
Abstract
Background and objective Patient response to laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol induction depends on many factors. Lidocaine has been used to reduce cardiovascular responses, coughing, and bucking induced by tracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of intravenous lidocaine on laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions during the induction of anaesthesia with propofol target-controlled infusion. Methods Eighty patients, 16-54 years of age, weighing between 45 and 100 kg, who underwent minor surgery, were randomly divided into two groups (the lidocaine and control groups). Anaesthesia was induced with propofol target-controlled infusion at a target plasma concentration of 6 mu g ml(-1). The lidocaine group received 1.5 mg kg(-1) of lidocaine 50 s after starting target-controlled infusion and the control group received an equivalent volume of saline. Laryngeal mask airways were inserted when propofol effect-site concentrations reached 2.5 mu g ml(-1). Laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions (mouth opening, gagging, coughing, movements, laryngospasm, overall ease of insertion, and hiccups) were assessed, and haemodynamic responses were monitored for 3 min after laryngeal mask airway insertion. Results No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of hemodynamic responses. However, the lidocaine group showed lower incidences of coughing (5 vs. 22.5%), gagging (25 vs. 55%), and laryngospasm (2.5 vs. 17.5%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion Pretreatment with intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg kg(-1) during induction with propofol target-controlled infusion improves laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions. Eur J Anaesthesiol 26:377-381 (c) 2009 European Society of Anaesthesiology.
Keywords
anesthetics; drug delivery systems; drug targeting; laryngeal masks; lidocaine; MASKS; propofol
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity