Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1593440
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Differences between bisoprolol and carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial
Author(s)
Lainscak, M; Podbregar, M; Kovacic, D; Rozman, J; von Haehling, S
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Respiratory Medicine
ISSN:
0954-6111
EISSN:
1532-3064
Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
Location
LONDON
Volume
105 Suppl 1
Page Numbers
S44-S49
Language
English
PMID
22015086
DOI
10.1016/S0954-6111(11)70010-5
Web of Science Id
WOS:000297779800009
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and is a key factor for beta blocker underprescription and underdosing. This study compared effects of bisoprolol and carvedilol in patients with both conditions.
METHODS:
This was a randomized open-label study, of bisoprolol and carvedilol during initiation and uptitration to target or maximal tolerated dose. Pulmonary function testing, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide were measured at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS:
We randomized 63 elderly patients (73 ± 9 years, 81% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 7%) with mild to moderate CHF (54% New York Heart Assocation class II) and moderate to severe COPD (76% Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 2). Target dose was tolerated by 31 (49%) patients and 19 (30%) patients experienced adverse events during follow-up (19% bisoprolol, 42% carvedilol, p = 0.045). Study medication had to be withdrawn in 8 (13%) patients (bisoprolol: 2 due to hypotension, 1 due to bradycardia; carvedilol: 2 due to hypotension and 1 due to wheezing, dyspnoea, and oedema, respectively). Forced expiratory volume in 1(st) second significantly increased in bisoprolol (1561 ± 414 ml to 1698 ± 519 ml, p = 0.046) but not carvedilol (1704 ± 484 to 1734 ± 548, p = 0.44) group. Both agents reduced heart rate (bisoprolol: 75 ± 14 to 68 ± 10, p = 0.007; carvedilol 78 ± 14 to 72 ± 12, p = 0.016) and had no effect on N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide.
CONCLUSIONS:
Beta blockers frequently caused adverse events, and thus 49% of patients could tolerate the target dose. Bisoprolol induced demonstrable improvement in pulmonary function and caused less adverse events.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity