Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1795398
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Manufacturing process, resultant risk profiles and their control in the production of nickel-cadmium (alkaline) batteries
Author(s)
Adams, RG
Year
1992
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Occupational Medicine
ISSN:
0962-7480
EISSN:
1471-8405
Report Number
NIOSH/00210245
Volume
42
Issue
2
Page Numbers
101-106
Language
English
PMID
1606303
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1992JD31600010
Abstract
Health risks associated with the production of alkaline batteries were reviewed. Each of the production steps and its improvement through the years were discussed. The following were listed as the principle compounds used in production: nickel-sulfate (7786814), nickel-hydroxide (12054487), sulfuric-acid (7664939), cobalt (7440484), graphite (7782425), cadmium (7440439), cadmium-oxide (1306190), cadmium-hydroxide (21041952), and potassium-hydroxide (1310583). Of the related health risks, only renal effects in the form of proteinuria has been confirmed from one study to the next. Proteinuria was attributed to reduced absorption by the renal tubule with subsequent secretion of low molecular weight proteins of the alpha two, beta, and gamma globulin fractions. One study showed that between 1946 and 1976 the mean exposure of workers to cadmium in the air was reduced by nearly three orders of magnitude, from milligrams to micrograms per cubic meter. Other investigations showed that between 1968 and 1984, the mean concentration of cadmium in the urine of workers involved in platemaking dropped from about 45 to 9 micrograms per liter. The author concludes that due to the long half life of cadmium in the body, exposure levels must continue to be kept at a minimum. Each case of exposure should be considered individually, taking into account the worker's previous exposure, age, work hygiene, renal condition, and smoking status.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity