Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1852297
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Comparison of MicroSeal and system B/Obtura II obturation techniques
Author(s)
Cathro, PR; Love, RM
Year
2003
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
International Endodontic Journal
ISSN:
0143-2885
EISSN:
1365-2591
Volume
36
Issue
12
Page Numbers
876-882
Language
English
PMID
14641428
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00741.x
Web of Science Id
WOS:000186871100009
URL
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00741.x
Exit
Abstract
AIM:
To compare the proportion of gutta-percha, sealer and voids following the filling of simulated root canals in plastic blocks using two warm gutta-percha techniques.
METHODOLOGY:
Ten simulated root canals in plastic blocks were prepared using System GT Rotary Files and a.02 taper size 40 Quantec rotary nickel-titanium instrument and then filled with MicroSeal and Kerr EWT sealer. A further 10 simulated canals were prepared solely with System GT Rotary Files and obturated with System B/Obtura II and Kerr EWT sealer. All blocks were sectioned at 1 mm intervals. The sectioned root fillings were photographed through a stereomicroscope and the resultant slides scanned. The images were analysed using adobe photoshop 6.0 to give the proportions of gutta-percha, sealer or void at each level. The data were analysed using unpaired Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test.
RESULTS:
The MicroSeal technique produced a dense homogeneous gutta-percha fill at the apical 1 and 2 mm levels similar to the System B/Obtura II technique, but further coronally the sealer became mixed into the MicroFlow gutta-percha producing a heterogeneous mass with significantly less (P < 0.05) solid gutta-percha in the root filling compared to System B/Obtura II. The MicroSeal technique generally had more pooling of cement than the System B technique, however, this was only significantly different (P < 0.05) at the 4 mm level. The System B/Obtura II obturation gave an average of 99.27% +/- 1.09 gutta-percha fill at all levels.
CONCLUSIONS:
The MicroSeal technique produced a heterogeneous fill consisting of the MicroFlow Master Cone and gutta-percha from the MicroFlow Cartridge mixed with sealer. The System B/Obtura II technique produced a homogeneous fill at all levels.
Keywords
canal filling; quality of filling; thermomechanical
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity