Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
1977989 
Journal Article 
Comparative analysis of dideoxy sequencing, the KRAS StripAssay and pyrosequencing for detection of KRAS mutation 
Gao, J; Li, Y; Sun, P; Shen, Lin 
2010 
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN: 1007-9327
EISSN: 2219-2840 
16 
38 
4858-4864 
English 
AIM: To compare the differences between dideoxy sequencing/KRAS StripAssay/pyrosequencing for detection of KRAS mutation in Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples with tumor cells >= 50% were collected from 100 Chinese CRC patients at Beijing Cancer Hospital. After the extraction of genome DNA from FFPE samples, fragments contained codons 12 and 13 of KRAS exon 2 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and analyzed by dideoxy sequencing, the KRAS StripAssay and pyrosequencing. In addition, the sensitivities of the 3 methods were compared on serial dilutions (contents of mutant DNA: 100%, 50%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 1%, 0%) of A549 cell line DNA (carrying the codon 12 Gly>Ser mutation) into wild-type DNA (human normal intestinal mucosa). The results of dideoxy sequencing, the KRAS StripAssay and pyrosequencing were analyzed by Chromas Software, Collector for KRAS StripAssay and the pyrosequencing PyroMarkTM Q24 system, respectively. RESULTS: Among 100 patients, KRAS mutations were identified in 34%, 37% and 37% of patients by dideoxy sequencing, the KRAS StripAssay and pyrosequencing, respectively. The sensitivity was highest with the KRAS StripAssay (1%), followed by pyrosequencing (5%), and dideoxy sequencing was lowest (15%). Six different mutation types were found in this study with 3 main mutations Gly12Asp (GGT>GAT), Gly12Val (GGT>GTT) and Gly13Asp (GGC>GAC). Thirty-three patients were identified to have KRAS mutations by the 3 methods, and a total of 8 patients had conflicting results between 3 methods: 4 mutations not detected by dideoxy sequencing and the KRAS StripAssay were identified by pyrosequencing; 3 mutations not detected by dideoxy sequencing and pyrosequencing were identified by the KRAS StripAssay; and 1 mutation not detected by pyrosequencing was confirmed by dideoxy sequencing and the KRAS StripAssay. Among these discordant results, the results identified by dideoxy sequencing were consistent either with the KRAS StripAssay or with pyrosequencing, which indicated that the accuracy of dideoxy sequencing was high. CONCLUSION: Taking a worldwide view of reports and our results, dideoxy sequencing remains the most popular method because of its low cost and high accuracy. (C) 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved. 
DNA mutational analysis; KRAS; Mutation; Dideoxy sequencing; KRAS StripAssay; Pyrosequencing 
IRIS
• Formaldehyde [archived]
     Reproductive and Developmental Effects
          Screened
               Title/abstract
                    Methodology/therapeutics
     Retroactive RIS import
          2015
               FA DevRepro 072115
                    Methodology/Therapeutics-Population Criteria
• IRIS Formaldehyde (Inhalation) [Final 2024]
     Literature Indexing
          Other sources and cited references
     Literature Identification
          Reproductive and Developmental Effects
               Excluded