Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2130790
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Phototoxicity testing in guinea-pigs
Author(s)
Lovell, WW; Sanders, DJ
Year
1992
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Food and Chemical Toxicology
ISSN:
0278-6915
EISSN:
1873-6351
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Location
OXFORD
Report Number
BIOSIS/92/15966
Volume
30
Issue
2
Page Numbers
155-160
Language
English
PMID
1555796
DOI
10.1016/0278-6915(92)90151-a
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1992HM53800009
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/027869159290151A
Exit
Abstract
BIOSIS COPYRIGHT: BIOL ABS. The photoirritant potential of topically applied chemicals was studied using guinea-pigs. Solutions of test chemicals were applied to the skin, and after 30 min the animals were irradiated with near-ultraviolet radiation. Skin reactions were assessed subjectively between 3 and 72 hr after the start of treatment. Acridine and anthracene caused immediate photoirritation, whereas reaction to 8-methoxy-psoralen (8-MOP) and delayed; acridine was weakly active compared with the strong photoirritancy o anthracene and 8-MOP. Ethanol and a mixture of dimethylacetamide-acetone-ethanol (DEA) were satisfactory solvents, and a time interval of 15 to 30 min between application and irradiation was optimal. It is concluded that animal tests should not be recommended if ingredients have negligible absorption of sunlight. The safety hazard of ingredients absorbing near-ultraviolet and visible radiation may be assessed by laboratory animal procedures to satisfy governmental regulations. Th
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity