Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2245959
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Nitrates for stable angina: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Author(s)
Wei, J; Wu, T; Yang, Q; Chen, Mao; Ni, J; Huang, D
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
International Journal of Cardiology
ISSN:
0167-5273
EISSN:
1874-1754
Volume
146
Issue
1
Page Numbers
4-12
Language
English
PMID
20557963
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.019
Web of Science Id
WOS:000285779700009
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect (harms and benefits) of nitrates for stable angina. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials with both parallel and crossover design were included. The following outcome measures were evaluated: number of angina attacks weekly and nitroglycerin consumption, quality of life, total exercise duration, time to onset of angina and time to 1 mm ST depression. Results: Fifty-one trials with 3595 patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. Both intermittent and continuous regimens of nitrates lengthened exercise duration significantly by 31 and 53 s respectively. The number of angina attacks was significantly reduced by 2.89 episodes weekly for continuous administration and 1.5 episodes weekly for intermittent administration. With intermittent administration, increased dose provided with 21 s more length of exercise duration. With continuous administration, exercise duration was pronged more in low-dose group. Quality of life was not improved by continuous application of GTN patches and was similar between continuous and intermittent groups. In addition, 51.6% patients receiving nitrates complained with headache. Conclusion: Long-term administration of nitrates was beneficial for angina prophylaxis and improved exercise performance but might be ineffective for improving quality of life. With continuous regimen, low-dose nitrates were more effective than high-dose ones for improving exercise performance. By contrast, with intermittent regimen, high-dose nitrates were more effective. In addition, intermittent administration could bring zero-hour effect. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Coronary artery disease; Angina pectoris; Nitrates; Nitroglycerin; Isosorbide mononitrate; Isosorbide dinitrate; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials
Tags
IRIS
•
Nitrate/Nitrite
ATSDR literature
Supplemental LitSearch Update 1600-2015
PubMed
WoS
New to project
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity