Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2327694
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Differences in Curve Behavior After Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients With Open Triradiate Cartilages
Author(s)
Sponseller, PD; Betz, R; Newton, PO; Lenke, LG; Lowe, Tom; Crawford, A; Sucato, D; Lonner, B; Marks, M; Bastrom, T; Harms Study Grp
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Spine
ISSN:
0362-2436
EISSN:
1528-1159
Volume
34
Issue
8
Page Numbers
827-831
Language
English
PMID
19337136
DOI
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819139ef
Web of Science Id
WOS:000265677600014
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN:
Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the results of spinal fusion in patients with open triradiate cartilages (OTRC) and closed triradiate cartilages (CTRC).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:
Patients with OTRC at the time of spinal fusion may be at increased risk of developing postoperative changes related to growth.
METHODS:
From a database of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, we identified 44 patients with OTRC (mean age, 11.6 years) and 450 patients with CTRC (mean age, 15.6 years) and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients in both groups were treated with anterior-only, posterior-only, or combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion; none had all-pedicle screw posterior instrumentation.
RESULTS:
In the OTRC group, anterior or posterior instrumentation, but not the combined approach, resulted in a significant mean late increase in the main curve (4.4 degrees and 7.3 degrees vs. 0 degrees , respectively; P = 0.002), an approach-related difference not seen in the CTRC group. Significantly more OTRC patients had proximal levels added on after surgery than did CTRC patients (18% vs. 8%, respectively; P = 0.02), and there was a trend toward this phenomenon distally (29% vs. 19%, respectively; P = 0.10). Proximal and distal junctional kyphosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Reoperation rate was 11% and 7% for OTRC and CTRC patients, respectively. For the selectively fused Lenke 1C curves in OTRC and CTRC patients, there was a trend in the uninstrumented lumbar curve toward a smaller lumbar curve before surgery (36 degrees and 41 degrees , respectively; P = 0.07) and a larger curve after surgery (27 degrees and 24 degrees , respectively; P = 0.07).
CONCLUSION:
Patients with scoliosis and OTRC have a greater risk of adding-on proximally and of loss of correction with anterior-only instrumentation; they may also have less predictable lumbar correction from selective thoracic fusion. However, after combined surgery, they have results similar to those of more skeletally mature patients.
Keywords
scoliosis; triradiate cartilage; fusion
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity