Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2480002
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Greenhouse gas emission in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review
Author(s)
Mander, U; Dotro, G; Ebie, Y; Towprayoon, S; Chiemchaisri, C; Nogueira, SF; Jamsranjav, B; Kasak, K; Truu, J; Tournebize, J; Mitsch, WJ
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Ecological Engineering
ISSN:
0925-8574
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
66
Issue
Elsevier
Page Numbers
19-35
DOI
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.006
Web of Science Id
WOS:000336445800004
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925857413005065
Exit
Abstract
A literature analysis of 158 papers published in international peer-reviewed journals indexed by the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge from 1994 to 2013 showed that CO2-C emission was significantly lower in free water surface (FWS) constructed wetlands (CW) than in subsurface flow (SF) CWs (median values from 95.8 to 137.0 mg m(-2) h(-1), respectively). In vertical subsurface flow (VSSF) CWs the CH4-C emission was significantly lower than in horizontal subsurface flow (HSSF) CWs (median values 3.0, 6.4, and 4.0 mgm(-2) h-1, respectively). There were no significant differences in N2O-N emission in various CW types (median for FWS, VSSF and HSSF CWs: 0.09, 0.12, and 0.13 mg m(-2) h(-1) correspondingly).
The highest value of emission factor (EF) of CH4 ((CH4-C/inflow TOCin)*100%) was found for FWS CWs (median 18.0%), followed by HSSF CWs (3.8%), and VSSF CWs (1.28%). Median values of N2O EFs ((N2O N/inflow TNin)*100%) differed significantly in all three CW types: 0.34% for HSSF, 0.11% for PATS, and 0.018% for VSSF CWs.
We found a significant correlation between TOCin and CH4-C emission and between the TNin and N2O-N emission values for all of the types of CWs we studied.
Hybrid CWs (e.g., the subsequent combination of VSSF, HSSF and FWS CWs) are beneficial from the point of view of both water purification and minimization of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Likewise, intermittent loading in VSSF CWs and macrophyte harvesting in HSSF and FWS CWs can mitigate GHG emissions. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Carbon dioxide; HSSF; Intermittent loading; Methane; Nitrous oxide; Pulsing hydrology; Surface flow constructed wetlands; VSSF
Tags
IRIS
•
Nitrate/Nitrite
Supplemental LitSearch Update 1600-2015
WoS
New to project
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity