Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
2580144 
Journal Article 
A comparative research of two lifting methods: electrostatic lifter and gelatin lifter 
Wiesner, S; Tsach, T; Belser, C; Shor, Y 
2011 
Yes 
Journal of Forensic Sciences
ISSN: 0022-1198
EISSN: 1556-4029 
56 Suppl 1 
S58-S62 
English 
21077876 
WOS:000285840200008 
Two-dimensional dust shoeprints are often of very high resolution and contain unique features. Lifting these prints in the most effective method may contribute much to preserving these fine details. A research was conducted by experts from Israel and Switzerland to compare gelatin lifters and electrostatic lifters for lifting shoeprints. Several substrates were chosen, and on each material a set of dry dust shoeprints was made. A set of wet prints was made on paper as well. The shoeprints were approximately of the same quality, and the only variable was the nature of the material. On substrates indifferent to the method used, the preferable sequence was tested. Gelatin lifter was superior on most substrates and for wet prints. The superior sequence for using both methods is electrostatic lifting followed by gelatin lifter. 
forensic science; shoeprints; footwear impression; electrostatic dust print lifter; gelatin lifter; pneumatic press; dust print