Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2583081
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of azelastine and fluticasone in a single nasal spray delivery device
Author(s)
Hampel, FC; Ratner, PH; Van Bavel, J; Amar, NJ; Daftary, P; Wheeler, W; Sacks, H
Year
2010
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
ISSN:
1081-1206
EISSN:
1534-4436
Volume
105
Issue
2
Page Numbers
168-173
Language
English
PMID
20674829
DOI
10.1016/j.anai.2010.06.008
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
A proof-of-concept study suggested that combination therapy with commercial azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray significantly improved nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with either agent alone.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare an azelastine-fluticasone combination nasal spray administered in a single-delivery device with a commercially available azelastine nasal spray and fluticasone nasal spray.
METHODS:
This 14-day, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was conducted during the Texas mountain cedar season. After a 5-day placebo lead-in, 610 patients with moderate-to-severe nasal symptoms were randomized to treatment with (1) azelastine nasal spray, (2) fluticasone nasal spray, (3) combination azelastine and fluticasone nasal spray, or (4) placebo nasal spray. All treatments were given as 1 spray per nostril twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), consisting of nasal congestion, runny nose, itchy nose, and sneezing.
RESULTS:
All 3 active groups were statistically superior (P <or= .02) to placebo, and the combination was statistically superior (P <or= .003) to either agent alone. The TNSS improved by 28.4% with combination azelastine-fluticasone, 20.4% with fluticasone, 16.4% with azelastine, and 11.2% with placebo. All 3 treatments were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS:
The combination azelastine-fluticasone nasal spray provided statistically significant improvement in the TNSS and additive clinical benefit compared with either agent alone in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00660517.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity