Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
2590227 
Journal Article 
Description and Verification of the NOAA Smoke Forecasting System: The 2007 Fire Season 
Rolph, GD; Draxler, RR; Stein, AF; Taylor, A; Ruminski, MG; Kondragunta, S; Zeng, J; Huang, HoC; Manikin, G; Mcqueen, JT; Davidson, PM 
2009 
1 
Weather and Forecasting
ISSN: 0882-8156 
24 
2 
361-378 
WOS:000265787000001 
An overview of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) current operational Smoke Forecasting System (SFS) is presented. This system is intended as guidance to air quality forecasters and the public for fine particulate matter (<= 2.5 mu m) emitted from large wildfires and agricultural burning, which can elevate particulate concentrations to unhealthful levels. The SFS uses National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS) Hazard Mapping System (HMS), which is based on satellite imagery, to establish the locations and extents of the fires. The particulate matter emission rate is computed using the emission processing portion of the U. S. Forest Service's BlueSky Framework, which includes a fuel-type database, as well as consumption and emissions models. The Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model is used to calculate the transport, dispersion, and deposition of the emitted particulate matter. The model evaluation is carried out by comparing predicted smoke levels with actual smoke detected from satellites by the HMS and the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) Aerosol/Smoke Product. This overlap is expressed as the figure of merit in space (FMS), the intersection over the union of the observed and calculated smoke plumes. Results are presented for the 2007 fire season (September 2006-November 2007). While the highest FMS scores for individual events approach 60%, average values for the 1 and 5 mu g m(-3) contours for the analysis period were 8.3% and 11.6%, respectively. FMS scores for the forecast period were lower by about 25% due, in part, to the inability to forecast new fires. The HMS plumes tend to be smaller than the corresponding predictions during the winter months, suggesting that excessive emissions predicted for the smaller fires resulted in an overprediction in the smoke area.