Khoo, HHui; Tan, RBH; Sagisaka, M
Background, aim and scope The interest in the use of biomass as a renewable energy resource has rapidly grown over the past few years. In Singapore, biomass resources are mostly from waste wood. This article presents a few technological options, namely carbonization, for the conversion of woody biomass into a solid fuel, charcoal.
Materials and methods In the first stage, a life cycle assessment (LCA) 'gate-to-gate' system was developed for a conventional carbonizer system, a modern carbonizer from Japan, and a proposed four-stage partial furnace carbonizer from Tunisia. The potential environmental impacts were generated for global warming potential, acidification, human toxicity and photochemical oxidant potential. Based on the first set of results, the second LCA investigation was carried out comparing the selected carbonizer from Japan and an existing incinerator in Singapore. The second LCA adopted a unique approach combining social costs of pollution with the economic factors of the two biomass conversion technologies.
Results The carbonizer from Japan resulted in approximately 85% less greenhouse gases than the conventional carbonization system and 54% less than the proposed four-stage carbonizer from Tunisia. In terms of acidification and human toxicity, the carbonizers from Japan and Tunisia display nearly similar results-both were considerably lower than the conventional carbonizer. For photochemical oxidant potential, very minimal emissions are generated from the four-stage carbonizer and nearly zero impact is realized for the carbonization technology from Japan.
Discussion From the first set of LCA results, the Japanese carbonizer is favored in terms of its environmental results. The highest environmental impacts from the conventional carbonizer were due to large and uncontrolled emissions of acidic gases, greenhouse gases (particularly CO(2) and CH(4)), particulates, and non-methane volatile organic compounds from both fugitive sources and energy requirements. The second LCA addressed the performance of the carbonizer from Japan against an existing incinerator in terms of environmental as well as cost performances. This unique approach translated pollution emissions into monetary costs to highlight the impacts of social health.
Conclusions For the first LCA, the accumulated impacts from the Japanese carbonizer proved to display significantly lower environmental impacts, especially for global warming potential. The overall environmental performance of the four-stage carbonizer from Tunisia ranked slightly lower than the one from Japan and much higher than the conventional carbonizer. The second LCA results displayed a noteworthy improvement of 90% for human health from the modern Japanese carbonizer technology-when compared against conventional incinerators. Without considering health issues or social costs, the total value per ton of wood treated is nearly similar for both incinerator and carbonizer.
Recommendations and perspectives The interest in biomass as raw material for producing energy has emerged rapidly in many countries. However, careful analysis and comparison of technologies are necessary to ensure favorable environmental outcomes. A full life cycle study, along with costs and the impact of pollution on society, should be performed before any large-scale biomass conversion technology is implemented. LCA can be applied to quantify and verify the overall environmental performance of a particular technology of interest as well as further explore the proposed technology in terms of costs and social implications.