Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2659843
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: a cosmic catastrophe
Author(s)
Holliday, VT; Surovell, T; Meltzer, DJ; Grayson, DK; Boslough, M
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Quaternary Science
ISSN:
0267-8179
EISSN:
1099-1417
Volume
29
Issue
6
Page Numbers
515-530
DOI
10.1002/jqs.2724
Web of Science Id
WOS:000344003200002
Abstract
In this paper we review the evidence for the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis (YDIH), which proposes that at similar to 12.9k cal a BP North America, South America, Europe and the Middle East were subjected to some sort of extraterrestrial event. This purported event is proposed as a catastrophic process responsible for: terminal Pleistocene environmental changes (onset of YD cooling, continent-scale wildfires); extinction of late Pleistocene mammals; and demise of the Clovis 'culture' in North America, the earliest well-documented, continent-scale settlement of the region. The basic physics in the YDIH is not in accord with the physics of impacts nor the basic laws of physics. No YD boundary (YDB) crater, craters or other direct indicators of an impact are known. Age control is weak to nonexistent at 26 of the 29 localities claimed to have evidence for the YDIH. Attempts to reproduce the results of physical and geochemical analyses used to support the YDIH have failed or show that many indicators are not unique to an impact nor to similar to 12.9k cal a BP. The depositional environments of purported indicators at most sites tend to concentrate particulate matter and probably created many 'YDB zones'. Geomorphic, stratigraphic and fire records show no evidence of any sort of catastrophic changes in the environment at or immediately following the YDB. Late Pleistocene extinctions varied in time and across space. Archeological data provide no indication of population decline, demographic collapse or major adaptive shifts at or just after similar to 12.9 ka. The data and the hypotheses generated by YDIH proponents are contradictory, inconsistent and incoherent. Copyright (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords
Clovis; extinction; extraterrestrial impact; Younger Dryas; Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity