Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2669077
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Quality assessment of Large-Eddy Simulation of wind flow around a high-rise building: Validation and solution verification
Author(s)
Gousseau, P; Blocken, B; van Heijst, GJF
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Computers and Fluids
ISSN:
0045-7930
Volume
79
Page Numbers
120-133
DOI
10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.03.006
Web of Science Id
WOS:000320147800010
Abstract
When undertaking wind engineering problems such as urban pollutant dispersion or pedestrian wind comfort with Computational Fluid Dynamics, an accurate simulation of the flow-field around buildings is required. In this respect, the good performance of Large-Eddy Simulation has already been established but because the formulation and the use of this turbulence modeling approach are complex, the uncertainty on the results is relatively high. This implies the need for Validation and Verification (V&V) studies like the one performed in the present paper for the wind flow around an isolated high-rise building with aspect ratio 1:1:2. In the first part of the study, the numerical results are compared with measurements from a reference wind-tunnel experiment and the agreement is quantified by validation metrics. The vortex method to generate inflow turbulence is shown to provide accurate results. Unexpectedly, the best agreement with the experiments is obtained on the coarsest computational grid, with 20 cells per building side, while a finer grid with 30 cells per building side over-estimates the turbulent kinetic energy measurements. A similar result was also found by earlier studies for different flow configurations. In the second part of the study, solution verification is performed. The Systematic Grid and Model Variation technique is used to provide estimates of the modeling and numerical error contributions. The LES_IQ indicator shows that a grid with 20 (resp. 30) cells per building side allows resolving 80% (resp. 91%) of the total turbulent kinetic energy in the region around the building. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); Validation and Verification (V&V); Urban wind flow; Large-Eddy Simulation (LES); Turbulence modeling; Bluff body aerodynamics
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity