Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2674540
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The ATWS analysis of one control rod withdraw out of the HTR-10GT core in addition with bypass valve failure
Author(s)
Lang, M; Dong, Y
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
ISSN:
0029-5493
EISSN:
1872-759X
Volume
271
Page Numbers
459-464
DOI
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.12.016
Web of Science Id
WOS:000336348100074
Abstract
The 10 MW high temperature gas cooled test reactor (HTR-10) has been built in Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) and has been operating successfully since the beginning of 2003. The core outlet temperature of HTR-10 is 700 degrees C. To verify the technology of gas-turbine direct cycle, at first INET had a plan to increase its core outlet temperature to 750 degrees C and use a helium gas turbine instead of the steam generator (then the reactor is called HTR-10GT). Though HTR-10 has good intrinsic safety, the design basic accidents and beyond design basic accidents of HTR10-GT must be analyzed according to China's nuclear regulations due to changed operation parameters. THERMIX code system is used to study the ATWS accident of one control rod withdrawal out of the core by a mistake. After a control rod in the side reflector was withdrawn out at a speed of 1 cm/s by a mistake, a positive reactivity was inserted and the reactor power increased and the temperature of the core increased. When the neutron flux of power measuring range exceeded 123% and the core outlet temperature was greater than 800 degrees C, the reactor should scram. It was supposed that all the control rods in the reflectors had been blocked and the reactor could not scram. Thus the accident went on and the core temperature and the system pressure increased but the reactor shutdown at last because of its natural negative temperature reactivity feedback mechanism, in spite of the failure of bypass valve. The residual heat would be removed out of the core by the cavity cooling system. During the accident sequence the maximum fuel temperature was 1283.3 degrees C. It was a litter than 1230 degrees C - the fuel temperature limitation of HTR-10. Now the sphere fuel used in HTR-10GT will also be used in HTR-PM and the temperature limitation will be raised to 1620 degrees C, so the HTR-10GT is safe during the ATWS of one control rod withdrawal out of the core. The paper also compares the analysis result of HTR10-GT to those of HTR-10. The results shows that the HTR-10GT is still safe during the accident though its operating temperature is higher than HTR-10. The analysis will be helpful to HTR-PM for they have the same outlet temperature of the core. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity