Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3019965
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Mesothelioma among motor vehicle mechanics: An updated review and meta-analysis
Author(s)
Garabrant, DH; Alexander, DD; Miller, PE; Fryzek, JP; Boffetta, P; Teta, MJ; Hessel, PA; Craven, VA; Kelsh, MA; Goodman, M
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Annals of Occupational Hygiene
ISSN:
0003-4878
EISSN:
1475-3162
Volume
60
Issue
1
Page Numbers
8-26
Language
English
PMID
26318158
DOI
10.1093/annhyg/mev060
Web of Science Id
WOS:000369997400003
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
We published a meta-analysis of the association between work as a motor vehicle mechanic and mesothelioma in 2004. Since then, several relevant studies on this topic have been published. Thus, to update the state-of-the-science on this issue, we conducted a new systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS:
A comprehensive PubMed literature search through May 2014 was conducted to identify studies that reported relative risk estimates for mesothelioma among motor vehicle mechanics (in general), and those who were engaged in brake repair (specifically). Studies were scored and classified based on study characteristics. Random-effects meta-analyses generated summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity of results was examined by calculating Q-test P-values (P-H) and I (2) estimates. Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were conducted for relevant study characteristics and quality measures.
RESULTS:
Ten case-control studies, one cohort study, and five proportionate mortality ratio (PMR)/standardized mortality odds ratio (SMOR) studies were identified and included in the quantitative assessment. Most meta-analysis models produced SRREs below 1.0, and no statistically significant increases in mesothelioma were observed. The SRRE for all studies was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.61-1.05) with significant heterogeneity (P-H <0.001, I (2) = 62.90). A similar SRRE was observed among the five Tier 1 studies with the highest quality ratings (SRRE = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.46-1.25), with no heterogeneity among studies (P-H = 0.912, I (2) = 0.00). Meta-analysis of the Tier 2 (n = 5) and Tier 3 (n = 6) studies resulted in SRREs of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.76-1.58) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.49-1.08), respectively. Restricting the analysis to Tiers 1 and 2 combined resulted in an SRRE of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.72-1.29). The SRRE specific to brake work (n = 4) was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.38-1.09).
CONCLUSIONS:
This meta-analysis of the epidemiologic studies provides evidence that motor vehicle mechanics, including workers who were engaged in brake repair, are not at an increased risk of mesothelioma.
Keywords
asbestos epidemiology; auto repair; brake dust; cancer epidemiology; chrysotile; mesothelioma
Tags
OPPT REs
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_A. Summary
Cited in TSCA RE related document
Suggested Literature: Public Comments
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_C. Engineering
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_D. Exposure
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_E. Fate
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_F. Human Health
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_Supplemental Search
LitSearch: Sept 2020 (Undated)
PubMed
Toxline
WoS
Legacy Uses
Health Outcomes
Additional Legacy Terms
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity