Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3080948
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
A risk assessment for exposure to glass wool
Author(s)
Wilson, R; Langer, AM; Nolan, RP
Year
1999
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
ISSN:
0273-2300
EISSN:
1096-0295
Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Location
SAN DIEGO
Volume
30
Issue
2 Pt 1
Page Numbers
96-109
Language
English
PMID
10536105
DOI
10.1006/rtph.1999.1344
Web of Science Id
WOS:000083426400002
Abstract
Synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs) have been widely used as insulation material in places where asbestos was used many years ago and therefore the hazards have been compared. Since the three principal types of asbestos fibers types have caused lung cancer at high exposures, there is a widely held belief that all fibers are carcinogenic if inhaled in large enough doses. Hence, on a morphological basis, SVFs have been studied for their carcinogenic potential. However, there is considerable evidence that differences exist among fibers in their potency to produce a carcinogenic response. In this attempt to carry out a numerical risk assessment for the installers of blown glass wool (fiber) insulation, we start with a characterization of the material; then we review the exposures both in manufacturing and installation. Neither the epidemiological studies of human exposure nor the animal studies have shown a marked hazardous effect from glass wool and we can therefore be sure that any effect that might exist is small. But in this case, as in many other situations where there is a potential hazard, society desires further reassurance and therefore we have made a mechanistic calculation. There are good estimates of the risk associated with exposure to chrysotile asbestos at high exposures and doses. We have therefore taken these numbers and discussed how much less risky an exposure to glass wool fibers might be. We conclude that for a given fiber count, glass wool is five to ten times less risky (and of course the risk might be zero). The risk for a nonsmoking installer of glass wool fiber insulation who wears a respirator is about 6 in a million (and might be zero) per year. This means that out of a million installers there might be six lung cancers from this cause every year or out of 10,000 installers there might be one in 16 years. The low risk of 6 in a million per year of a worker blowing glass wool is consistent with the fact that no one has found any of cancer attributable to the manufacture or installation of glass wool fibers in spite of diligent searches. This is compared with several other occupational risks. Nonetheless common prudence suggests that any installer of blown glass wool fiber insulation wear a respirator.
Keywords
Carcinogens; Mineral Fibers; Index Medicus; Occupational Diseases -- epidemiology; Construction Materials -- adverse effects; Animals; Inhalation Exposure; Risk Assessment -- methods; Occupational Diseases -- etiology; Mineral Fibers -- adverse effects; Occupational Exposure; Carcinogens -- adverse effects
Tags
OPPT REs
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_F. Human Health
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_Supplemental Search
LitSearch: Sept 2020 (Undated)
ProQuest
PubMed
Science Direct
Toxline
WoS
Legacy Uses
Health Outcomes
Additional Legacy Terms
Exposure
Additional Legacy Terms
Suggested Legacy References
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity