Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3083680
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Medico-legal aspects of malignant mesothelioma
Author(s)
Mowé, G; Gylseth, B
Year
1984
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine
ISSN:
0300-8037
Publisher
SCANDINAVIAN UNIVERSITY PRESS
Location
OSLO
Report Number
NIOSH/00137620
Volume
12
Issue
1
Page Numbers
15-23
Language
English
PMID
6231722
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1984SF83400004
Abstract
The object of this investigation was to discuss medico-legal aspects of malignant mesothelioma in relation to social insurance legislation for occupational injuries and diseases in Norway. During the period 1960-79 the Cancer Registry of Norway recorded a total of 155 men and 35 women with malignant mesothelioma. However, only 21 men and no women were notified to the National Insurance Institution as occupational disease cases before 31 December 1979, in spite of the well established causal association between occupational asbestos exposure and the disease. The investigation is based on these 21 patients. The long latency period from first asbestos exposure until appearance of the disease and the short survival were evident in this study. Furthermore, the legislation and provisions for occupational injuries and diseases in Norway are obviously intended for occupational accidents, and consequently the legal assessment of patients with malignant mesothelioma was complicated. For those notified, the delay in notification was considerable, and only 50% were notified before death. Delay in the claim procedure was also substantial, and few patients survived the claim procedure period. The decisions were not consistent, particularly decisions regarding "the year of injury" and appeared to have been more restrictive during recent years. One of the 21 cases was not accepted as occupational disease, because domestic exposure was considered more probable than occupational exposure.
Keywords
Asbestos; 1332-21-4; Index Medicus; Workers' Compensation -- legislation & jurisprudence; Time Factors; Lung Neoplasms -- analysis; Lung Neoplasms -- etiology; Asbestos -- analysis; Mesothelioma -- etiology; Asbestos -- adverse effects; Social Security -- legislation & jurisprudence; Mesothelioma -- analysis; Occupational Diseases -- etiology
Tags
OPPT REs
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_F. Human Health
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_Supplemental Search
LitSearch: Sept 2020 (Undated)
ProQuest
PubMed
Toxline
WoS
Legacy Uses
Health Outcomes
Exposure
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity