Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3151708
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants
Author(s)
Hirasawa, K; Shoji, N; Kobashi, C; Yamanashi, A
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
ISSN:
0721-832X
EISSN:
1435-702X
Volume
253
Issue
8
Page Numbers
1341-1346
Language
English
PMID
25981119
DOI
10.1007/s00417-015-3048-5
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the effects of pharmacologically induced mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants.
METHODS:
Thirty-eight eyes of 38 healthy young participants underwent kinetic perimetry (Octopus 900 perimeter) with III4e, I4e, I3e, I2e, and I1e stimuli. For each participant, 24 predetermined meridians with 15° intervals were automatically tested with a velocity of 3°/s under normal, mydriatic, and miotic conditions. Mydriasis and miosis were induced by one drop of 0.4 % tropicamide and 2 % pilocarpine hydrochloride, respectively. The isopter area and kinetic sensitivity were compared between the three pupil conditions.
RESULTS:
The average pupil size in the normal condition was 5.6 ± 0.9 mm, and it significantly increased to 8.5 ± 0.7 mm after mydriasis (p < 0.01) and decreased to 3.4 ± 0.8 mm after miosis (p < 0.01). Compared to the normal pupil, the isopter area of the dilated pupil was not significantly different under the III4e stimulus; however, it significantly decreased under the I4e, I3e, I2e, and I1e stimuli (p < 0.01). Compared to the normal pupil, the isopter area of the constricted pupil significantly decreased (p < 0.01) with the III4e stimulus and significantly increased with the I3e and I2e stimuli (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
For both pupil conditions, kinetic sensitivity at each meridian showed a similar trend to the isopter area under each stimulus. The isopter area of the dilated pupil generally decreased, whereas the isopter area of the constricted pupil showed various findings. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to changes in the isopter area associated with changes in the pupil size.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity