Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3164207
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Non mass-like enhancement categories detected by breast MRI and histological findings
Author(s)
Ballesio, L; Di Pastena, F; Gigli, S; D'ambrosio, I; Aceti, A; Pontico, M; Manganaro, L; Porfiri, LM; Tardioli, S
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
ISSN:
1128-3602
Volume
18
Issue
6
Page Numbers
910-917
Language
English
PMID
24706319
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To correlate the different non masslike enhancement categories detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and the corresponding histological findings.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Two experienced radiologists reviewed the MRI examinations of 94 patients presenting non mass-like enhancements who had performed histological evaluation. According to the BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon, non masslike enhancements were classified as focal, linear, segmental, regional, ductal and diffuse enhancements. We focused on segmental, regional and ductal patterns.
RESULTS:
Among the 94 patients, 52.1% showed a regional pattern, 27.7% a segmental pattern and 20.2% a ductal pattern of enhancement. Of the 49 patients showing a regional pattern, the histological diagnosis was ductal invasive carcinoma (DIC) in 28 cases, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 4 cases, lobular invasive carcinoma (LIC) in 3 cases and a benign disease in 9 cases. Of the 26 patients showing a segmental pattern, the histological outcome was DIC in 10 cases, DCIS in 7 cases and a benign disease in 5 cases. Among the 19 patients showing a ductal pattern, the result was DIC in 4 cases, DCIS in 4 cases and a benign disease in 7 cases. In most cases DIC presented as a regional pattern, while DCIS showed a segmental pattern in 26.9%, a ductal pattern in 21.1% and a regional pattern in 8.2% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings about ductal and segmental enhancements agree with the literature. We found a high rate of DIC presenting as a regional enhancement, instead; thus, we recommend a more detailed diagnosis, especially when an homogeneous/heterogeneous and clumped internal enhancement pattern is present.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity