Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3173302
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Inhaled nitric oxide for acute chest syndrome in adult sickle cell patients: a randomized controlled study
Author(s)
Maitre, B; Djibre, M; Katsahian, S; Habibi, A; Stankovic Stojanovic, K; Khellaf, M; Bourgeon, I; Lionnet, F; Charles-Nelson, A; Brochard, L; Lemaire, F; Galacteros, F; Brun-Buisson, C; Fartoukh, M; Mekontso Dessap, A
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Intensive Care Medicine
ISSN:
0342-4642
EISSN:
1432-1238
Volume
41
Issue
12
Page Numbers
2121-2129
Language
English
PMID
26431718
DOI
10.1007/s00134-015-4060-2
Web of Science Id
WOS:000363974600007
Abstract
PURPOSE:
Previous clinical trials suggested that inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) could have beneficial effects in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients with acute chest syndrome (ACS).
METHODS:
To determine whether iNO reduces treatment failure rate in adult patients with ACS, we conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. iNO (80 ppm, N = 50) gas or inhaled nitrogen placebo (N = 50) was delivered for 3 days. The primary end point was the number of patients with treatment failure at day 3, defined as any one of the following: (1) death from any cause, (2) need for endotracheal intubation, (3) decrease of PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 15 mmHg between days 1 and 3, (4) augmented therapy defined as new transfusion or phlebotomy.
RESULTS:
The two groups did not differ in age, gender, genotype, or baseline characteristics and biological parameters. iNO was well tolerated, although a transient decrease in nitric oxide concentration was mandated in one patient. There was no significant difference in the primary end point between the iNO and placebo groups [23 (46 %) and 29 (58 %); odds ratio (OR), 0.8; 95 % CI, 0.54-1.16; p = 0.23]. A post hoc analysis of the 45 patients with hypoxemia showed that those in the iNO group were less likely to experience treatment failure at day 3 [7 (33.3 %) vs 18 (72 %); OR = 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.06-0.68; p = 0.009].
CONCLUSIONS:
iNO did not reduce the rate of treatment failure in adult SCD patients with mild to moderate ACS. Future trials should target more severely ill ACS patients with hypoxemia.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:
NCT00748423.
Keywords
Hemoglobinopathies; Sickle cell; Anemia; Acute chest syndrome; Nitric oxide; Acute lung injury
Tags
•
LitSearch-NOx (2024)
Keyword Search
Toxicology
March 2014-November 2016
TIAB Screening
Toxicology
Exclude
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity