Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
3196047 
Journal Article 
Assessment of a Combined Panel of Six Serum Tumor Markers for Lung Cancer 
Molina, R; Marrades, RM; Augé, JM; Escudero, JM; Viñolas, N; Reguart, N; Ramirez, J; Filella, X; Molins, L; Agustí, A 
2016 
Yes 
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
ISSN: 1073-449X
EISSN: 1535-4970 
193 
427-437 
English 
RATIONALE: We have previously identified six serum tumor markers (TMs) (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 15.3, squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragment, neuron-specific enolase, and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide) related to the presence of lung cancer (LC).

OBJECTIVES: To validate their individual performance in an independent cohort, and to explore if their combined assessment (≥1 abnormal TM value) is a more accurate marker for LC presence.

METHODS: We determined these six TMs in 3,144 consecutive individuals referred to our institution by their primary care physician because of the clinical suspicion of LC.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: LC was excluded in 1,316 individuals and confirmed in 1,828 patients (1,563 with non-small cell LC and 265 with small cell LC). This study validated the previously reported performance of each individual TM. We also showed that their combined assessment (≥1 abnormal TM) had a better sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value (88.5, 82, 83.7, and 87.3%, respectively) than each TM considered individually and that it increased the diagnostic performance (area under the curve) of a clinical model that included tumor size, age, and smoking status. In patients with radiographic nodules less than 3 cm, the negative predictive value of the TM panel was 71.8%, hence providing some support for a more conservative diagnostic approach. Finally we identified two TMs (neuron-specific enolase and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide) that differentiate the risk of non-small cell LC from that of small cell LC.

CONCLUSIONS: The combined assessment of a panel of six serum TMs is a more accurate marker for LC presence than these same TMs considered individually. The potential of these TMs in the diagnostic and screening settings deserves further research.