Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3198893
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Combined Clinic-Home Approach for Upper Limb Robotic Therapy After Stroke: A Pilot Study
Author(s)
Kim, GJ; Rivera, L; Stein, J
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN:
0003-9993
EISSN:
1532-821X
Volume
96
Issue
12
Page Numbers
2243-2248
Language
English
PMID
26189202
DOI
10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.019
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the feasibility of a combined clinic-home intervention using a robotic elbow brace and, secondarily, to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of this clinic-home intervention.
DESIGN:
Nonrandomized pre-/postinterventional study.
SETTING:
Outpatient clinic and participants' homes.
PARTICIPANTS:
Individuals at least 6 months after stroke (N=11; 5 women and 6 men; mean age, 51.7y; mean time since stroke, 7.6y; mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] score, 22 of 66) were enrolled from the community.
INTERVENTIONS:
Participants received training in an outpatient clinic from an experienced occupational therapist to gain independence with use of the device (3-9 sessions) followed by a 6-week home program using the device at home.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Five instruments were administered before and after the study intervention: Modified Ashworth Scale, Box and Blocks test, FMA-UE, Arm Motor Ability Test, and Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use and Motor Activity Log-How Well subscales (MAL-AOU, MAL-HW).
RESULTS:
Nine participants completed the study. Participants used the device on average 42.9min/d, 5.3d/wk. The FMA-UE (t=3.32; P=.01), MAL-AOU (t=4.40; P=.002), and MAL-HW (t=4.02; P=.004) scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to discharge; the MAL-AOU (t=2.61; P=.035) and MAL-HW (t=2.47; P=.043) scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS:
This combined clinic-home intervention was feasible and effective. Participants demonstrated improvements in arm impairment and self-reported use of the arm from baseline to discharge; they continued to report significant improvement in actual use of the arm at 3-month follow-up.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity