Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
3213175 
Journal Article 
Soft Contact Lenses with Positive Spherical Aberration for Myopia Control 
Cheng, X; Xu, J; Chehab, K; Exford, J; Brennan, N 
2016 
1 
Optometry and Vision Science
ISSN: 1040-5488
EISSN: 1538-9235 
93 
4 
353-366 
English 
26704144 
PURPOSE: To determine whether soft contact lenses with positive spherical aberration (+SA) can slow myopia progression.

METHODS: Eligible subjects (N = 127, primarily Asian) aged 8 to 11 years were randomized to wear either control (spherical design) or test (with +SA) soft daily disposable contact lenses for a minimum of 1 and up to 2 years (treatment phase). Subjects from the initial cohorts (N = 82) were then followed for an additional 1.5 years while wearing a marketed spherical daily disposable contact lens (withdrawal phase). Axial length and spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction (SECAR) were measured at baseline and every 6 months in both phases.

RESULTS: During the first year of treatment, lens type (test vs. control) had a statistically significant impact on axial elongation (p = 0.0409). Eyes wearing test lenses increased in length by 0.11 (65.3%) and 0.14 (38.6%) mm less than eyes wearing control soft lenses at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.05 at both time points). The principal control of axial elongation occurred during the first 6 months. Spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction change from baseline was significantly less in the test cohort than the control cohort by 0.21D (54.0%) at 6 months (p < 0.05) but not at 12 months (0.14D, p > 0.05). Lens type was not overall a significant factor affecting refractive error change (p = 0.0677). After ceasing treatment, neither the rate of axial elongation nor change in SECAR was significantly different between the initial two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS: The soft contact lens with +SA slowed axial growth of the eye, although this did not translate into a sustained statistically significant effect on SECAR. The majority of the treatment effect occurred in the initial 6 months of wear. No evidence of rebound effect was observed after ceasing treatment.