Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3240598
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Addressing alcohol problems in primary care: A cluster randomized, controlled trial of a systems intervention - The screening and intervention in primary care (SIP) study
Author(s)
Saitz, R; Horton, NJ; Sullivan, LM; Moskowitz, MA; Samet, JH
Year
2003
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
ISSN:
0003-4819
EISSN:
1539-3704
Volume
138
Issue
5
Page Numbers
372-382
Web of Science Id
WOS:000181257300002
Abstract
Background: screening and intervention for alcohol problems
can reduce drinking and its consequences but are often not implemented. Objective: To test
whether providing physicians with patients' alcohol screening results and simple individualized
recommendations would affect the likelihood of a physician's having a discussion with patients
about alcohol during a primary care visit and would affect subsequent alcohol use. Design:
Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Urban academic primary care practice.
Participants: 41 faculty and resident primary care physicians and 312 patients with hazardous
drinking. Interventions: Providing physicians with alcohol screening results (CAGE questionnaire
responses, alcohol consumption, and readiness to change) and recommendations for their patients
at a visit. Measurements: Patient self-report of discussions about alcohol use immediately after
the physician visit and alcohol use 6 months later. Results: Of 312 patients, 240 visited faculty
physicians, 301 (97%) completed the outcome assessment after the office visit, and 236 (76%) were
followed for 6 months. Faculty physicians in the intervention group tended to be more likely than
faculty physicians in the control group to give patients advice about drinking (adjusted
proportion, 64% [95% CI, 47% to 79%] vs. 42% [CI, 33% to 53%]) and to discuss problems associated
with alcohol use (74% [CI, 59% to 85%] vs. 51% [CI, 39% to 62%]). Resident physicians' advice
and discussions did not differ between groups. Six months later, patients who saw resident
physicians in the intervention group had fewer drinks per drinking day (adjusted mean number of
drinks, 3.8 [CI, 1.9 to 5.71 versus 11.6 [CI, 5.4 to 17.7]). Conclusions: Although effects seem
to differ by physician level of training, prompting physicians with alcohol screening results and
recommendations for action can modestly increase discussions about alcohol use and advice to
patients and may decrease alcohol consumption.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity