Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3289879
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture
Author(s)
Pretty, JN; Brett, C; Gee, D; Hine, RE; Mason, CF; Morison, JIL; Raven, H; Rayment, MD; van der Bijl, G
Year
2000
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Agricultural Systems
ISSN:
0308-521X
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Location
OXFORD
Volume
65
Issue
2
Page Numbers
113-136
Language
English
DOI
10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00031-7
Web of Science Id
WOS:000089669800003
URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/assessment-total-external-costs-uk-agriculture/docview/49234407/se-2?accountid=171501
Exit
Abstract
This trans-disciplinary study assesses total external
environmental and health costs of modern agriculture in the UK. A wide range of datasets have
been analysed to assess cost distribution across sectors. We calculate the annual total external
costs of UK agriculture in 1996 to be pound 2343 m (range for 1990-1996: pound 1149-3907 m),
equivalent to pound 208/ha of arable and permanent pasture. Significant costs arise from
contamination of drinking water with pesticides (pound 120 m/year), nitrate (pound 16 m),
Cryptosporidium (pound 23 m) and phosphate and soil (pound 55 m), from damage to wildlife,
habitats, hedgerows and drystone walls (pound 125 m), from emissions of gases (pound 1113 m),
from soil erosion and organic carbon losses (pound 106 m), from food poisoning (pound 169 m), and
from bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (pound 607 m). This study has only estimated those
externalities that give rise to financial costs, and so is likely to underestimate the total
negative impacts of modern agriculture. These data help to identify policy priorities,
particularly over the most efficient way to internalise these external costs into prices. This
would imply a redirection of public subsidies towards encouraging those positive externalities
under-provided in the market place, combined with a mix of advisory and institutional mechanisms,
regulatory and legal measures, and economic instruments to correct negative externalities.
Further work examining the marginal costs and benefits of UK agriculture would help to inform
future policy development. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
externalities; agriculture; water pollution; health; pesticides; biodiversity; food poisoning; policies
Tags
IRIS
•
Nitrate/Nitrite
Supplemental LitSearch Update 1600-2015
WoS
New to project
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity