Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3291894
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments
Author(s)
Dunford, RW; Ginn, TC; Desvousges, WH
Year
2004
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Ecological Economics
ISSN:
0921-8009
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Location
AMSTERDAM
Volume
48
Issue
1
Page Numbers
49-70
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.07.011
Web of Science Id
WOS:000188548300007
Abstract
Federal and state government agencies and Indian tribes,
acting on behalf of the public as trustees, can recover damages to natural resources from
companies responsible for oil spills or hazardous-substance releases. Habitat equivalency
analysis (HEA) is a method for estimating the appropriate amount of compensation for interim
losses resulting from such spills or releases. HEA has several restrictive assumptions that are
not met in many situations and its input parameters often are not known with certainty, which can
lead to substantial differences between HEA results and the ""true"" amount of compensation for
losses resulting from oil spills or hazardous-substance releases. Critical assumptions of HEA
include a preference for compensation with the same services as were injured, a fixed proportion
of habitat services to habitat value, and a constant real value of services over time. HEA also
requires that complex ecological services are expressed as a single metric and that the
incremental effect of spills/releases are estimated reliably over time. Notwithstanding these
important assumptions and limitations, HEA is frequently used to settle natural resource damage
(NRD) claims and two HEA applications to NRD claims have been upheld by the courts. When properly
structured and applied, HEA can produce relatively reliable results for most oil spills and
simple cases involving hazardous-substance releases. Even when unmet assumptions and/or
differences in professional judgment with respect to input parameters produce differences in HEA
results, the method can be useful in achieving an NRD settlement in a variety of situations.
However, HEA should only be viewed as a framework to provide a general approximation of any
required restoration, and not as a substitute for a formal NRD assessment in cases involving
complex hazardous-substance releases. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords
NRDA; natural resources; damages; habitat; restoration
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity