Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3292038
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs
Author(s)
Hansen, AJ; Knight, RL; Marzluff, JM; Powell, S; Brown, K; Gude, PH; Jones, A
Year
2005
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Ecological Applications
ISSN:
1051-0761
EISSN:
1939-5582
Publisher
WILEY
Location
HOBOKEN
Volume
15
Issue
6
Page Numbers
1893-1905
Web of Science Id
WOS:000233858900005
Abstract
Low-density rural home development is the fastest-growing
form of land use in the United States since 1950. This ""exurban"" development (similar to 6-25
homes/km(2)) includes urban fringe development (UFD) on the periphery of cities and rural
residential development (RRD) in rural areas attractive in natural amenities. This paper
synthesizes current knowledge on the effects of UFD and RRD. We present two case studies and
examine the patterns of biodiversity response and the ecological mechanisms that may underlie
these responses. We found that many native species have reduced survival and reproduction near
homes, and native species richness often drops with increased exurban densities. Exotic species,
some human-adapted native species, and species from early successional stages often increase with
exurban development. These relationships are sometimes nonlinear, with sharp thresholds in
biodiversity response. These effects may be manifest for several decades following exurban
development, so that biodiversity is likely still responding to the wave of exurban expansion
that has occurred since 1950. The location of exurban development is often nonrandom relative to
biodiversity because both are influenced by biophysical factors. Consequently, the effects on
biodiversity may be disproportionately large relative to the area of exurban development. RRD is
more likely than UFD to occur near public lands; hence it may have a larger influence on nature
reserves and wilderness species. The ecological mechanisms that may underlie these responses
involve alteration of habitat, ecological processes, biotic interactions, and increased human
disturbance. Research on the patterns and mechanisms of biodiversity remains underdeveloped, and
comparative and experimental studies are needed. Knowledge resulting from such studies will
increase our ability to understand, manage, and mitigate negative impacts on biodiversity.
Keywords
biodiversity; biotic interactions; ecological mechanisms; fire; habitat fragmentation; landscape management; land cover; land use; rural residential development; urban fringe development; weeds
Conference Name
87th Annual Meeting of the Ecological-Society-of-America
Conference Location
Tucson, AZ
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity