Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3333125
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
'Tolerable' hillslope soil erosion rates in Australia: Linking science and policy
Author(s)
Bui, EN; Hancock, GJ; Wilkinson, SN
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
ISSN:
0167-8809
Volume
144
Issue
1
Page Numbers
136-149
DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.022
Web of Science Id
WOS:000298898200016
Abstract
This paper reviews water-borne soil erosion in Australia in the context of current environmental policy needs. Sustainability has emerged as a central tenet of environmental policy in Australia and waterborne hillslope soil erosion rates are used as one of the indicators of agricultural sustainability in State of the Environment reporting. We review attempts to quantify hillslope erosion rates over Australia and we identify areas at risk of exceeding natural baseline rates. We also review historical definitions of sustainable, or tolerable erosion rates, and how to set these rates. There are many ways to estimate hillslope erosion and these can create confusing results. Moreover their application for land management purposes requires nuanced interpretations that ultimately depend on the desired objective of decision-makers. Soil is the earth surficial material that serves as a medium for plant growth and the notion of tolerable soil erosion arose historically to assess the impact of soil loss on agricultural uses. However now that the impact of erosion on aquatic ecosystems been recognized as a major concern for Australia, the concept of tolerable erosion needs to be revised. Here we discuss three definitions of tolerable soil erosion, following recent literature. We derive estimates of long-term agricultural sustainability based on natural soil production rates and discuss this in relation to other defined land-management objectives such as aquatic ecosystem health. We conclude that the desired objectives of land managers must be clearly articulated before questions of where to invest to control erosion and how to assess return-on-investment can be answered. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Aquatic habitat; Decision-making; Environmental management; Integration research; Sediment delivery rate; Transdisciplinarity; Water quality
Tags
•
Third Biofuels Report to Congress
50% to 100%
50% to 100%
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity