Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4453260
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) vs quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) approach for detection and quantification of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) DNA in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) cutaneous biopsies
Author(s)
Arvia, R; Sollai, M; Pierucci, F; Urso, C; Massi, D; Zakrzewska, K
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Journal of Virological Methods
ISSN:
0166-0934
Volume
246
Page Numbers
15-20
Language
English
PMID
28414163
DOI
10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.04.003
Web of Science Id
WOS:000403737500003
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is associated with Merkel cell carcinoma and high viral load in the skin was proposed as a risk factor for the occurrence of this tumour. MCPyV DNA was detected, with lower frequency, in different skin cancers but since the viral load was usually low, the real prevalence of viral DNA could be underestimated.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the performance of two assays (qPCR and ddPCR) for MCPyV detection and quantification in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples.
METHODS:
Both assays were designed to simultaneous detection and quantification of both MCPyV as well as house-keeping DNA in clinical samples. The performance of MCPyV quantification was investigated using serial dilutions of cloned target DNA. We also evaluated the applicability of both tests for the analysis of 76 FFPE cutaneous biopsies.
RESULTS:
The two approaches resulted equivalent with regard to the reproducibility and repeatability and showed a high degree of linearity in the dynamic range tested in the present study. Moreover, qPCR was able to quantify ≥105 copies per reaction, while the upper limit of ddPCR was 104 copies. There was not significant difference between viral load measured by the two methods The detection limit of both tests was 0,15 copies per reaction, however, the number of positive samples obtained by ddPCR was higher than that obtained by qPCR (45% and 37% respectively).
CONCLUSIONS:
The ddPCR represents a better method for detection of MCPyV in FFPE biopsies, mostly these containing low copies number of viral genome.
Tags
IRIS
•
Formaldehyde [archived]
HAWC
Human cancer
Excluded
Search Update 2016-2017
Exposure
WoS
Human Cancer studies
WoS
Human Cancer studies
Search Update 2018-2021
2017-2018 LitSearch
Exposure
Search Update
WOS
Human Cancer Studies
Search Update
WOS
•
IRIS Formaldehyde (Inhalation) [Final 2024]
Literature Indexing
WoS
2021 Systematic Evidence Map
Literature Identification
Cancer in Humans
Excluded
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity