Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4495749
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Compost benefits for agriculture evaluated by life cycle assessment. A review
Author(s)
Martinez-Blanco, J; Lazcano, C; Christensen, TH; Munoz, P; Rieradevall, J; Moller, J; Anton, A; Boldrin, A
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
ISSN:
1774-0746
EISSN:
1773-0155
Volume
33
Issue
4
Page Numbers
721-732
DOI
10.1007/s13593-013-0148-7
Web of Science Id
WOS:000325101500006
Abstract
As compost use in agriculture increases, there is an urgent need to evaluate the specific environmental benefits and impacts as compared with other types of fertilizers and soil amendments. While the environmental impacts associated with compost production have been successfully assessed in previous studies, the assessment of the benefits of compost on plant and soil has been only partially included in few published works. In the present study, we reviewed the recent progresses made in the quantification of the positive effects associated to biowaste compost use on land by using life cycle assessment (LCA). A total of nine environmental benefits were identified in an extensive literature review and quantitative figures for each benefit were drawn and classified into short-, mid-, and long-term. The major findings are the following: (1) for nutrient supply and carbon sequestration, the review showed that both quantification and impact assessment could be performed, meaning that these two benefits should be regularly included in LCA studies. (2) For pest and disease suppression, soil workability, biodiversity, crop nutritional quality, and crop yield, although the benefits were proved, quantitative figures could not be provided, either because of lack of data or because the benefits were highly variable and dependent on specific local conditions. (3) The benefits on soil erosion and soil moisture could be quantitatively addressed, but suitable impact assessment methodologies were not available. (4) Weed suppression was not proved. Different research efforts are required for a full assessment of the benefits, apart from nutrient supply and carbon sequestration; additional impact categories-dealing with phosphorus resources, biodiversity, soil losses, and water depletion-may be needed for a comprehensive assessment of compost application. Several of the natural mechanisms identified and the LCA procedures discussed in the paper could be extensible to other organic fertilizers and compost from other feedstocks.
Keywords
Sustainable agriculture; Environmental impact; Organic fertilizer; Biowaste; Soil organic matter; C sequestration; Disease suppression; Soil quality
Tags
•
Third Biofuels Report to Congress
50% to 100%
50% to 100%
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity