Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4745264
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Techno-Economic Evaluation of Deploying CCS in SMR Based Merchant H-2 Production with NG as Feedstock and Fuel
Author(s)
Collodi, G; Azzaro, G; Ferrari, N; Santos, S
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Energy Procedia
ISSN:
1876-6102
Book Title
Energy Procedia
Volume
114
Page Numbers
2690-2712
DOI
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1533
Web of Science Id
WOS:000419147303086
Abstract
Hydrogen is a crucial raw materials to other industries. Globally, nearly 90% of the hydrogen or HyCO gas produced is consumed by the ammonia, methanol and oil refining industries. In the future, hydrogen could play an important role in the decarbonisation of transport fuel (i.e. use of fuel cell vehicles) and space heating (i.e. industrial, commercial, building and residential heating).
This paper summarizes the results of the feasibility study carried out by Amec Foster Wheeler for the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG) with the purpose of evaluating the performance and costs of a modern steam methane reforming without and with CCS producing 100,000 Nm(3)/h H-2 and operating as a merchant plant. This study focuses on the economic evaluation of five different alternatives to capture CO2 from SMR. This paper provides an up-to-date assessment of the performance and cost of producing hydrogen without and with CCS based on technologies that could be erected today.
This study demonstrates that CO2 could be captured from an SMR plant with an overall capture rate ranging between 53 to 90%. The integration of CO2 capture plant could increase the NG consumption by -0.03 to 1.41 GJ per Nm(3)/h of H-2. The amount of electricity exported to the grid by the SMR plant is reduced. The levelised cost of H-2 production could increase by 2.1 to 5.1 (sic) cent per Nm(3) H-2 (depending on capture rate and technology selected). This translates to a CO2 avoidance cost of 47 to 70 (sic)/t.
Keywords
industrial CCS; hydrogen production; chemical absorption; MDEA; MEA; low temperature CO2 capture; cryogenic; membrane
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity