Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4745575
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Comparison between three types of ammonia synthesis reactor configurations in terms of cooling methods
Author(s)
Khademi, MH; Sabbaghi, RS
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
ISSN:
0263-8762
EISSN:
1744-3563
Volume
128
Page Numbers
306-317
DOI
10.1016/j.cherd.2017.10.021
Web of Science Id
WOS:000424736500027
Abstract
In this study, simulation and optimization of ammonia synthesis reactor based on the implemented cooling methods was presented in three cases: internal direct cooling reactor (IDCR), adiabatic quench cooling reactor (AQCR), and adiabatic indirect cooling reactor (AICR). A one-dimensional pseudo-homogeneous model was developed to investigate the effect of various parameters on maximum N-2 conversion at the outlet of IDCR, 2-bed AQCR and 2-bed AICR. Differential evolution algorithm was applied to optimize three types of ammonia synthesis reactor, considering N-2 conversion as the main objective. A comparison between IDCR, 2/3/4-bed AQCR and 2/3/4-bed AICR was carried out under the optimal operating conditions by considering the same catalyst volume, operating pressure and feed mass flow rate for all three types of reactor. The optimization results show that a maximum conversion of 0.26 was achieved in 3-bed AQCR, in which the temperature of feed gas to the first bed was 635 K, dimensionless lengths of each bed were 0.13, 0.25 and 0.62, and fractions of total feed flow rate quenching from the first to end bed were 0.2, 0.26 and 0.54, respectively. The optimum value of N-2 conversion was found 0.3 in IDCR at the gas temperature to the cooling tube of 495 K. In 3-bed AICR, the highest conversion of 0.3 was determined at temperature of inlet gas to each bed, 696 K, and dimensionless length of each bed, 0.33. Generally, IDCR, 3-bed AICR and 3-bed AQCR were suggested as ammonia synthesis reactor configurations from the most favorable to the least favorable. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Ammonia synthesis; Internal direct cooling reactor; Adiabatic quench cooling reactor; Adiabatic indirect cooling reactor; Optimization; Differential evolution
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity